|
Post by imperfectgolfer on Aug 2, 2012 19:56:02 GMT -5
Consider this BM-forum thread. www.brianmanzella.com/golfing-discussions/17537-comparisons-thought-motion-analysis-v-s-doppler.htmlThe BM-groupies are discussing whether motion analysis is better (or not better) than Trackman. cwdlaw223 then states-: "No question about it for me. Trackman! My swing isn't going to change that much after 28 years, 2 kids, wife, job, etc. I can make changes/fixes quicker with Trackman. That's just my opinion. It might be easier to teach students with MATT since they can see what their body is doing." He is stating that his swing isn't going to change much after 28 years, but he then claims that he can make changes/fixes quicker with Trackman. How is that possible without changing one's swing action? If one makes "changes/fixes" to get better Trackman readings, then one must be altering one's swing action mechanically/biomechanically in some manner. Jeff.
|
|