|
Post by gmbtempe on Dec 22, 2011 23:26:36 GMT -5
Physics!
They barely teach basic math now
|
|
|
Post by imperfectgolfer on Jan 1, 2012 23:49:19 GMT -5
nmg,
I agree that BM is losing his cool.
Here is his latest hysterical diatribe - posted in a larger-sized font in his BM-forum thread (presumably because he really wants to be taken more seriously).
BM wrote-:
"Back to the THREAD STARTER:
If the lie angle is perfectly aligned, and the Center of Gravity is any decent amount behind the face—and most are—ANY clubface position at impact except for when it is exactly square to the path...will not "point" in the direction of the only thing that matters to the ball—the top of the D-Plane.
So, if you go out and buy a million dollar camera, you better go find the CAD drawings of the club you are using, and a super math wizard, because what you THINK YOU SEE, the so-called "measured" clubface, will be incorrect!!!!
In other words VIDEO will lie.
The STILL will LIE!!!
But TrackMan will do a great job of analyzing the face using the measured angle of attack, measured resultant path, measured ball flight.
And the golfer or teacher or both will be able to ADJUST THE D-PLANE and potentially win millions of dollars because of it.
Got it?
The VIDEO will lie.
TrackMan will give the golfer a very accurate representation of the EFFECTIVE clubface (which is the top of the D-Plane) and the measure bottom of the D-Plane.
Got it?
Got it?
Want me to make it simpler for you???
You and your little cameras and your eyeballs will LIE A MILLION LIES and the folks using TrackMan will make MILLIONS of dollars.
The ball only knows about the D-Plane.
All you guys know is mis-information.
You lose again."
Millions of dollars being won as a result of Trackman. Who is he kidding?
BM states-: "The ball only knows about the D-plane". That's obviously not true! The ball has no conscious knowledge of the D-plane theory. The ball only reacts to the clubface orientation and clubhead path at impact, and also to the influence of any clubface displacement secondary to an off-center strike.
Jeff.
|
|
|
Post by richie3jack on Jan 6, 2012 15:56:03 GMT -5
This was an obvious response to the threads going on over at my forum.
I'm not a scientist nor do I have a science background. I think we are running into the crux of whether or not to take Tuxen at his word because I'm sure a lot of his work is proprietary and he doesn't want to give that information away to anybody.
For instance, I refuse to give away my formulas in my advanced golf metrics because they are proprietary information. I may give away what goes into the formula, but not how a calculate the actual formula.
3JACK
|
|
|
Post by tomdavis76 on Jan 6, 2012 19:59:09 GMT -5
|
|