|
Post by imperfectgolfer on Jan 12, 2013 13:57:44 GMT -5
Here is BM making wild claims again in his usual hyperbolic fashion.
He claims without evidence that there is nothing that can give as much precision information as that AMD 6d-of-3D system.
Nonsense!
How can that system hope to compare to a Phantom camera which provides direct visual data every 1/10,000th-100,000th of a second (depending on camera speed). Give me 5 videos with a Phantom camera taken at 10,000 frames/sec from 5 different viewing angles (face/on, DTL, upline, back view and birds-eye view) - and then try and prove to me that you can discern "something" with that AMD machine that I cannot discern from those 5 videos.
Jeff.
|
|
|
Post by imperfectgolfer on Jan 12, 2013 19:56:31 GMT -5
BM wrote the following in that same BM-forum thread-: "I am going to say this once and only once....
There is NO WAY to determine when the PELIVS, TORSO, LEAD ARM, and CLUB are peaking in speed without a device like this.
None."
I actually agree with this claim. A Phantom camera doesn't measure the peak speed of body parts, but who cares! It may be of intellectual interest to know when a body part reaches its peak speed in an individual golfer from an intellectual perspective, but it doesn't prove that another golfer should reach his peak speed of that same body part at that same time in his downswing action. For example, if ten different golfers have ten different degrees of spinal flexibility and also ten different degrees of torso-pelvic separation in their downswing action, then the timing of their peak upper torso (shoulder) rotation speed will likely be different. Do you really believe that there is a "gold standard" for when the upper torso (shoulders) should reach their peak speed in the downswing that applies to all golfers?
Jeff.
|
|
|
Post by bullet on Jan 15, 2013 11:02:38 GMT -5
What's your opinion on the graphs of the shitty long ball hitter sadlowski
|
|